National Security

Providing analysis on long-term strategic interests to Parliament and MPs, and resources on governance and defence priorities.

Canada’s future depends on a Parliament that acts in the long-term national interest. The democratic process is not just about elections—it is about ensuring that MPs are prepared, aware, and incentivized to make decisions that protect Canada’s security, economy, and societal well-being.


Why the Right MPs Matter

A strong Parliament requires representatives who understand the strategic priorities of the nation and who can act in alignment with Canada’s long-term interests. Key issues include:

  1. National Security & Geopolitical Awareness
    MPs must recognize Canada’s position in a complex global landscape. Strategic priorities include:

    • Prioritize strengthening partnerships with like-minded democracies, particularly the BANC countries (Britain, Australia, New Zealand, Canada). The BANC countries, the United States, and the EU serve as the three pillars of Western civilization, built with strategic redundancy, allowing them to cooperate and compete technologically—like the three player lines in hockey, each with distinct roles, supporting and challenging each other to drive innovation and strengthen collective progress.

    • Coordinating closely as always with the United States on economic, technological, and defense initiatives, with support from the EU, to counter strategic competitors from non-Western-aligned countries.

    • Focusing on dual-use technology development to enhance both civilian and defense capabilities.

    • Moving past fears of a US “takeover” and instead protecting Canada’s interests by working with allies.

    • Recognizing that mass immigration is a racket and that mass immigration demographic changes, and the presence of policymakers in Parliament aligned with this approach, are potentially currently the primary national security risks, potentially undermining Canada’s cohesion and causing key allies to distance themselves, reducing intelligence sharing and military cooperation.

  2. Policy Alignment & Long-Term Incentives
    Parliamentary decision-making can be improved when MPs are encouraged to prioritize policies that support Canada’s collective interests, rather than short-term political gains. This includes:

    • Incentivizing legislation that strengthens national economic resilience.

    • Promoting policies that advance technological innovation and defense capabilities.

    • Encouraging transparency and accountability in voting and policymaking.

  3. Institutional Oversight & Integrity
    Strong institutions are essential for detecting and preventing self-serving behavior. Solutions that avoid excessive bureaucracy include:

    • Independent ethics and oversight panels using modern technology and automated reporting systems.

    • Multi-party task forces for national security and strategic policymaking, insulating decisions from partisan agendas.

    • Auditing mechanisms for lobbying, conflicts of interest, and foreign influence.

  4. Candidate Awareness & Training
    MPs benefit from structured training programs that focus on:

    • Geopolitical strategy, particularly relations with allies and competitors.

    • Economic and technological trends critical to Canada’s long-term resilience.

    • Practical policy foresight, helping leaders make informed, nation-first decisions.


A strong and resilient Parliament including Senate depend on leaders who are selected for competence, integrity, and long-term commitment to Canada’s interests. Society benefits when public service, governance, and civic contribution are recognized and rewarded, and when policies reinforce merit-based leadership and societal cohesion. By supporting MPs and Senators who demonstrate responsibility, strategic foresight, and dedication to national priorities, Canada can ensure that those who uphold the foundations of governance are empowered rather than overburdened.


Confused Experts

Many media commentators or other experts appear confused about what the United States is doing in various geopolitical regions. Much of this confusion stems from interpreting current actions through older foreign-policy frameworks that assumed a relatively stable liberal international order. Today, policymakers are weighing the advantages and disadvantages of engagement, sanctions, and deterrence in a far more complex environment shaped by the rise of new major powers. Expanding military capabilities, technological advances, and growing economic reach mean decisions involving energy-rich states or regional power centers are rarely isolated. Instead, they are part of broader strategic calculations about influence, alliances, supply chains, and access to critical resources.

Some analysts argue the deeper reason for the confusion is that because of emerging powers the world itself is moving away from the post-Cold War liberal global order toward a more civilizationally oriented system. In this environment, countries increasingly emphasize sovereignty, cultural identity, and regional spheres of influence rather than universal political models. From that perspective, many actions that appear contradictory may actually reflect strategic positioning within a shifting global balance of power. When media and so called expert analysis continues to rely on older assumptions about globalization and universal norms, policy decisions that are actually strategic recalculations can appear inconsistent or puzzling.


Strategic Economic and Security Considerations

  • US Concerns & Canadian Competitiveness: The United States has expressed concerns over Canada’s high immigration levels, economic competitiveness, and defense readiness. Aligning Canadian policies with broader strategic objectives strengthens North American security and economic stability.

  • Global Partnerships: Canada must strengthen collaboration with BANC countries and the EU, complementing and supporting the US lead in countering challenges from non-Western-aligned countries economically, technologically, and militarily.

  • Decoupling from Non-Western-Aligned Countries: Canada must reduce strategic dependencies on nations outside the Western alliance to safeguard its sovereignty and security.

  • Dual-Use Technology Development: Canada should prioritize technologies that serve both civilian and defense applications, ensuring resilience and strategic advantage.

  • Immigration and Integration Policy: Thoughtful immigration policy is paramount to national security. Policymakers must reassess the risks of dual loyalties among newcomers and the influence of those in Parliament aligned with radical multicultural policies. Prioritizing applicants who are aligned with Canada’s long-term national interests is essential. Mass immigration demographic changes, combined with policymakers in power who support this approach, is potentially the number one national security threat facing Canada today.

  • Our allies need to be confident that we stand with them for the long term—committed to facing enduring threats together and unwavering in our partnerships rather than shifting alignment toward other nations—and that shifts in population composition over time could potentially influence the effectiveness of long-term strategic commitments. We also need to hold our allies to account and encourage them to reduce immigration.

  • Impact of Radical Multiculturalism: Canada’s current approach to multiculturalism has created friction with allies, leading to reduced intelligence sharing, constrained military cooperation, and diminished trust. Mass immigration demographic changes, combined with policymakers in power who support this approach, potentially affects Canada’s cohesion and national security.

  • Policy Mindset Shift: Canadian policymakers should move past fears of US dominance and instead embrace partnerships with trusted allies, protect Canada’s core interests, and support coordinated Western strategy.


OCI: Supporting Research and Training for MPs

OCI is positioned to provide research-based guidance and training for both existing and aspiring MPs, parliamentarians and high-level government officials in general. By offering evidence-driven analysis, strategy briefings, and practical policy support, OCI helps ensure that parliamentary decision-making is aligned with Canada’s long-term national interests, strengthening governance, national resilience, and strategic coordination with allies.


Path Forward

The challenges facing Canada today—from geopolitical competition to technological leadership—cannot be solved by short-term thinking or partisan politics. Strengthening Parliament through strategic awareness, systemic incentives, and institutional integrity ensures that decisions serve the long-term interests of all Canadians.

This page highlights the critical issues and potential solutions to strengthen Canada’s governance. To support OCI in conducting research and helping train MPs, consider donating to fund in-depth analysis and actionable recommendations.

Don't just read about regulation modernization; Stay in touch, to make it happen.

Please also consider making a donation or becoming a member.